Aggestam, F., Konczal, A., Sotirov, M. et al. 2020. Can nature conservation and wood production be reconciled in managed forests? A review of driving factors for integrated forest management in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 268, 110670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110670
Alberdi, I., Nunes, L., Kovac, M. et al. 2019. The conservation status assessment of Natura 2000 forest habitats in Europe: capabilities, potentials and challenges of national forest inventories data. Annals of Forest Science 76, 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0820-4
Alfaro, R. I., Fady, B., Vendramin, G. G. et al. 2014. The role of forest genetic resources in responding to biotic and abiotic factors in the context of anthropogenic climate change. Forest Ecology and Management, 333, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.006
Araujo M.B., Alagador D., Cabeza M., Nogues-Bravo D., Thuiller W. 2011. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters 14, 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01610.x
Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., Dean, T. J. 2018. How to pay for saving biodiversity. Science, 360(6388), 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3454
Barras, AG, Braunisch, V, Arlettaz, R. 2021. Predictive models of distribution and abundance of a threatened mountain species show that impacts of climate change overrule those of land use change. Diversity and Distributions, 27: 989– 004. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13247
Barredo Cano, J.I., Brailescu, C., Teller, A., Sabatini, F.M., Mauri, A., Janouskova, K. 2021. Mapping and assessment of primary and old-growth forests in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/13239
Bässler, C., Hothorn, T., Brandl, R., Müller, J. 2013. Insects overshoot the expected upslope shift caused by climate warming. Plos One, 8(6), e65842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065842
Bauhus J., Kouki, J., Paillet, Y., Asbeck, T., Marchetti, M. 2017. How does the forest-based bioeconomy impact forest biodiversity? In: Winkel, G. (ed.) Towards a sustainable European forest-based bioeconomy – assessment and the way forward. What Science Can Tell Us 8, European Forest Institute, Pp. 67–76.
Bauhus, J., Puettmann, K.J., Kuehne, C. 2013. Close-to-nature forest management in Europe: does it support complexity and adaptability of forest ecosystems? In: Messier, C., Puettmann, K.J., Coates, K.D. (eds.). Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems: building resilience to the challenge of global change. Routledge. Pp. 187–213. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203122808
Bengtsson, J., Angelstam, P., Elmqvist, T., Emanuelsson, U., Folke, C., Ihse, M., Moberg, F. Nyström, M. 2003. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32: 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-32.6.389
Bengtsson, J., Nilsson, S.G., Franc, A., Menozzi, P. 2000. Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 132(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00378-9
Blondeel, H., Perring, M. P., Depauw, L., De Lombaerde, E., Landuyt, D., De Frenne, P., Verheyen, K. 2020. Light and warming drive forest understorey community development in different environments. Global change biology, 26(3), 1681–1696. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14955
Bouget, C., Lassauce, A., Jonsell, M. 2012. Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity – a review focused on the situation in Europe. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42: 1421–1432. doi:10.1139/X2012-078
Bozzano, M., Jalonen, R., Thomas, E., Boshier, D., Gallo, L., Cavers, S., Bordács, S., Smith, P. Loo, J. (eds.) 2014. Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources – Thematic Study. Rome, FAO and Bioversity International.
Braunisch, V., Roder, S., Coppes, J., Froidevaux, J. S., Arlettaz, R., Bollmann, K. 2019. Structural complexity in managed and strictly protected mountain forests: Effects on the habitat suitability for indicator bird species. Forest Ecology and Management, 448, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.007
Butterfield, B.J., Copeland, S.M., Munson, S.M., Roybal, C.M. and Wood, T.E. 2017. Prestoration: using species in restoration that will persist now and into the future. Restoration Ecology, 25: S155–S163. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12381
Campagnaro, T., Brundu, G., Sitzia, T. 2018. Five major invasive alien tree species in European Union forest habitat types of the Alpine and Continental biogeographical regions. Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.07.007
de Groot, M., Eler, K., Flajšman, K., et al. 2016. Differential short-term response of functional groups to a change in forest management in a temperate forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 376, 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.025
De Vries, S., Alan, M., Bozzano, M., Burianek, V., Collin, E., Cottrell, J. Ivankovic, M., Kelleher, C., Koskela, J., Rotach, P., Vietto, L., Yrjänä, L. 2015. Pan-European strategy for genetic conservation of forest trees and establishment of a core network of dynamic conservation units. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN), Bioversity International, Italy.
Dirnböck, T., Pröll, G., Austnes, K., et al. 2018. Currently legislated decreases in nitrogen deposition will yield only limited plant species recovery in European forests. Environmental research letters, 13(12), 125010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf26b
Dullinger, S., Dendoncker, N., Gattringer, A., Leitner, M., Mang, T., Moser, D., Mücher, C.A., Plutzar, C., Rounsevell, M., Willner, W., Zimmermann, N.E., Hülber, K. 2015. Modelling the effect of habitat fragmentation on climate-driven migration of European forest understorey plants. Diversity and Distributions, 21: 1375–1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12370
Dvořák, D., Vašutová, M., Hofmeister, J., Beran, M., Hošek, J., Běťák, J., Burel, J., & Deckerová, H. 2017. Macrofungal diversity patterns in central European forests affirm the key importance of old-growth forests. Fungal Ecology, 27, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2016.12.003
EEA 2018. Forest dynamics in Europe and their ecological consequences. Briefing no. 16/2018.
EEA 2020. State of nature in the EU. Results from reporting under the nature directives 2013–2018.
Ehlers, T. and Packer, F. 2017. Green Bond Finance and Certification, BIS Quarterly Review, September. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3042378
Eichenberg, D., Bowler, D.E., Bonn, A., Bruelheide, H., Grescho, V., Harter, D., Jandt, U., May, R., Winter, M., Jansen, F. 2021. Widespread decline in Central European plant diversity across six decades. Global Change Biology, 27(5), 1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15447
Eliades, N. G. H., Gailing, O., Leinemann, L., Fady, B., Finkeldey, R. 2011. High genetic diversity and significant population structure in Cedrus brevifolia Henry, a narrow endemic Mediterranean tree from Cyprus. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 294(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0453-z
Ellis, EC., Gauthier, N., Goldewijk, KK., et al. 2021. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 17. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023483118
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Wunder, S. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
Erichsen, E. O., Budde, K. B., Sagheb‐Talebi, K., Bagnoli, F., Vendramin, G. G., Hansen, O. K. 2018. Hyrcanian forests – Stable rear‐edge populations harbouring high genetic diversity of Fraxinus excelsior, a common European tree species. Diversity and Distributions, 24(11), 1521–1533. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12783
Fahrig, L. (2001). How much habitat is enough? Biological conservation, 100(1), 65-74.
Fahrig, L. 2013. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography 40, 1649–1663. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12130
Fahrig, L. 2019. Habitat fragmentation: A long and tangled tale. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12839
Ferraro, P. and Kiss, A. 2002. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science, 298, 1718–1719. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078104
FOREST EUROPE, 2020. State of Europe’s Forests 2020.
Freer-Smith, P., Muys, B., Bozzano, M., Drössler, L., Farrelly, N., Jactel, H., Korhonen, J., Minotta, G., Nijnik, M. and Orazio, C. 2019. Plantation forests in Europe: challenges and opportunities. From Science to Policy 9. European Forest Institute. https://doi.org/10.36333/fs09
Fuchs, D., Hänel, K., Jeßberger, J., Lipski, A., Reck, H., Reich, M., Sachtleben, J., Finck, P., Riecken, U. 2007. National bedeutsame Flächen für den Biotopverbund. Natur und Landschaft, 82 (8): 345–352.
Fuchs, D., Hänel, K., Lipski, A., Reich, M., Finck, P., Riecken, U. 2010. Länderübergreifender Biotopverbund in Deutschland. Grundlagen und Fachkonzept. Ergebnisse aus den Forschungs- und Entwicklungsvorhaben ”Länderübergreifende Achsen des Biotopverbunds“ (FKZ 804 85 005) und ”Biotopverbundachsen im europäischen Kontext“ (FKZ 08 85 0400) im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz, Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 96.
Gossner, M. M., Floren, A., Weisser, W. W., & Linsenmair, K. E. 2013. Effect of dead wood enrichment in the canopy and on the forest floor on beetle guild composition. Forest Ecology and Management, 302, 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.039
Gömöry, G., Himanen, K., Tollefsrud, M. et al. 2021. Genetic aspects in production and use of forest reproductive material: Collecting scientific evidence to support the development of guidelines and decision support tools. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN), European Forest Institute. 216 p.
Graveland, J., Van Der Wal, R., Van Balen, J. H., Van Noordwijk, A. J. 1994. Poor reproduction in forest passerines from decline of snail abundance on acidified soils. Nature, 368(6470), 446–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/368446a0
Hanley, N., and White, B. 2014. Incentivizing the provision of ecosystem services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 7(3–4), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000064
Haslett, J. R., Berry, P. M., Bela, G., Jongman, R. H., Pataki, G., Samways, M. J., & Zobel, M. 2010. Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 2963-2977.
Hermy, M., Honnay, O., Firbank, L., Grashof-Bokdam, C., Lawesson, J.E. 1999. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biological Conservations 91: 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00045-2
Hilmers, T, Friess, N, Bässler, C, et al. 2018. Biodiversity along temperate forest succession. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55: 2756–2766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13238
Hoffmann, S., Irl, S.D.H., Beierkuhnlein, C. 2019. Predicted climate shifts within terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nature Communications 10, 4787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12603-w
Hole, D. G., Willis, S. G., Pain, D. J., et al. 2009. Projected impacts of climate change on a continent-wide protected area network. Ecology Letters, 12(5), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01297.
Hulme, P. E. 2021. Unwelcome exchange: International trade as a direct and indirect driver of biological invasions worldwide. One Earth, 4(5), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.015
Hultberg, T., Sandström, J., Felton, A., Öhman, K., Rönnberg, J., Witzell, J., Cleary, M. 2020. Ash dieback risks an extinction cascade. Biological Conservation, 244, 108516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108516
IPBES 2018. The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia. Rounsevell, M., Fischer, M., Torre-Marin Rando, A., Mader, A. (eds.). Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany.
IPBES 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio E.S., et al. (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
Janssen, P., Bergès, L., Fuhr, M., Paillet, Y. 2019. Do not drop OLD for NEW: conservation needs both forest continuity and stand maturity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(7), 370–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2086
Jongman, R. H., Külvik, M., Kristiansen, I. 2004. European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and urban planning, 68(2–3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00163-4
Krosby M, Tewksbury J, Haddad NM, Hoekstra J. 2010. Ecological Connectivity for a Changing Climate: Ecological Connectivity. Conservation Biology. 24(6):1686–9x
Krumm F. and Vitková L. (eds.). 2016. Introduced tree species in European forests: opportunities and challenges. European Forest Institute.
Krumm, F., Schuck, A., Kraus, D. 2013. Integrative management approaches: a synthesis. In: IN FOCUS – Managing Forests in Europe: ‘Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity’. Kraus, D. and Krumm, F.(eds.). European Forest Institute. Pp. 256–262.
Krumm, F., Schuck, A., Rigling, A. (eds). 2020. How to balance forestry and biodiversity conservation – A view across Europe. European Forest Institute (EFI); Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmendorf.
Kunz J., Löffler G., Bauhus J. 2018. Minor European broadleaved tree species are more drought-tolerant than Fagus sylvatica but not more tolerant than Quercus petraea. Forest Ecology and Management 414, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.016
Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., et al. 2020. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An EU ecosystem assessment, EUR 30161 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Ispra.
Mölder, A., Schmidt, M., Engel, F., Schönfelder, E., & Schulz, F. 2015. Bryophytes as indicators of ancient woodlands in Schleswig-Holstein (Northern Germany). Ecological Indicators, 54, 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.044
Müller, J. and Bütler, R. 2010 ‘A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: A baseline for management recommendations in European forests’, European Journal of Forest Research, 129(6), pp. 981–992. doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0400-5.
Neff, F., Brändle, M., Ambarlı, D., Ammer, C., Bauhus, J., Boch, S., Hölzel, N., Klaus, V.H., Kleinebecker, T., Prati, D., Schall, P., Schäfer, D., Schulze, E., Seibold, S., Simons, N.K., Weisser, W.W., Pellissier, L., Gossner, M.M. 2021. Changes in plant-herbivore network structure and robustness along land-use intensity gradients in grasslands and forests. Science advances, 7(20), eabf3985. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf3985
Oettel, J. and Lapin, K. 2021. Linking forest management and biodiversity indicators to strengthen sustainable forest management in Europe. Ecological Indicators 122 (2021): 107275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107275
Perhans, K., Gustafsson, L., Jonsson, F., Nordin, U., & Weibull, H. 2007. Bryophytes and lichens in different types of forest set-asides in boreal Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 242(2–3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.055
Petermann, J. S., Roberts, A. L., Hemmerling, C., Bajerski, F., Pascual, J., Overmann, J., Weisser, W. W., Ruess, L., & Gossner, M. M. 2020. Direct and indirect effects of forest management on tree-hole inhabiting aquatic organisms and their functional traits. Science of the Total Environment, 704, 135418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135418
Petermann, J. S., Rohland, A., Sichardt, N., Lade, P., Guidetti, B., Weisser, W. W., & Gossner, M. M. 2016. Forest management intensity affects aquatic communities in artificial tree holes. PLoS ONE, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155549
Pötzelsberger, E., Schuck, A., den Herder, M. 2021. How does forest management affect biodiversity? In: Mauser, H (ed). 2021. Key questions on forests in the EU. Knowledge to Action 4, European Forest Institute. https://doi.org/10.36333/k2a04
Pötzelsberger, E., Spiecker, H., Neophytou, C., Mohren, F., Gazda, A., Hasenauer, H. 2020. Growing Non-native Trees in European Forests Brings Benefits and Opportunities but Also Has Its Risks and Limits. Current Forestry Reports, 6, 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-020-00129-0
Ricotta, C., Carboni, M., & Acosta, A. T. R. 2015. Let the concept of indicator species be functional! Journal of Vegetation Science, 26(5), 839–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12291
Rivers, M.C., Beech, E., Bazos, I. et al. 2019 European Red List of Trees. Cambridge, UK and Brussels, Belgium: IUCN.
Robledo-Arnuncio J.J., Alía R., Gil L. 2004. High levels of genetic diversity in a long-term European glacial refugium of Pinus sylvestris L. Forest Genetics 11(3): 239–248.
Rosenzweig, C. et al. 2007.) Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working GroupII to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel onClimate Change. Parry, M.L. et al. (eds). Cambridge University Press. Pp. 79–131
Sabatini, F.M., Burrascano, S., Keeton, W.S., Levers, C., Lindner, M., Pötzschner, F., et al. 2018. Where are Europe’s last primary forests? Diversity and Distributions 24(10), 1426–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12778
Sabatini, F.M., de Andrade, R.B., Paillet, Y. et al. Trade-offs between carbon stocks and biodiversity in European temperate forests. Global Change Biology 25: 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14503
Sabatini, F.M., Keeton, W.S., Lindner, M. et al. Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe. Diversity and Distributions 26,1646–1662. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13158
Salzman, J., Bennett, G., Carroll, N., Goldstein, A., Jenkins, M. 2018. The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability, 1(3), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0
Schall, P., Gossner, M.M., Heinrichs, S., Fischer, M., Boch, S., Prati, D., Jung, K., Baumgartner, V., Blaser, S., Böhm, S., Buscot, F., Daniel, R., Goldmann, K., Kaiser, K., Kahl, T., Lange, M., Müller, J., Overmann, J., Renner, S.C., Schulze, E.D., Sikorski, J., Tschapka, M., Türke, M., Weisser, W.W., Wemheuer, B., Wubet, T., Ammer, C. 2018. The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12950
Schuldt, B., Buras, A., Arend, M. et al. 2020. A first assessment of the impact of the extreme 2018 summer drought on Central European forests. Basic and Applied Ecology, 45, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.04.003
Seibold, S., Gossner, M.M., Simons, N.K. et al. 2019. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574, 671–674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3
Seidl, R., Klonner, G., Rammer, W., Essl, F., Moreno, A., Neumann, M., Dullinger, S. 2018. Invasive alien pests threaten the carbon stored in Europe’s forests. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04096-w
Stokland, J. N., J. Siitonen, B. G. Jonsson. 2012. Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Storch, F., Dormann, C. F., Bauhus, J. 2018 Quantifying forest structural diversity based on large-scale inventory data: a new approach to support biodiversity monitoring. Forest Ecosystems 5: 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0151-1
Storch, F., Kändler, G., Bauhus, J. 2019. Assessing the influence of harvesting intensities on structural diversity of forests in south-west Germany. Forest Ecosystems 6, 40, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0199-6
Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., et al. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427(6970), 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02121
Vaissière, A.-C., Quétier, F., Calvet, C., Levrel, H., Wunder, S. 2020. Biodiversity offsets and payments for environmental services: Clarifying the family ties. Ecological Economics, 169, 106428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106428
Vanderwel, M. C., Malcolm, J. R., Smith, S. M., & Islam, N. 2006. Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 225(1–3), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.051
Van Meerbeek, K., Muys, B., Schowanek, S. D., Svenning, J. C. 2019. Reconciling Conflicting Paradigms of Biodiversity Conservation: Human Intervention and Rewilding. BioScience, 69(12), 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz106
Varela, E., Pulido, F., Moreno, G., Zavala, M. Á. 2020. Targeted policy proposals for managing spontaneous forest expansion in the Mediterranean. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(12), 2373–2380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13779
Viszlai, I., et al. 2016. Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services. SWOT Analysis and Possibilities for Implementation. JRC Technical Reports. European Commission, Joint Research Center. Ispra, Italy.
Vitasse, Y., Ursenbacher, S., Klein, G., et al. 2021. Phenological and elevational shifts of plants, animals and fungi under climate change in the European Alps. Biological Reviews.
Willis, K. J. and Birks, H. J. B. 2006. What is natural? The need for a long-term perspective in biodiversity conservation. Science, 314(5803), 1261–1265.ge. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122667
Wunder, S., and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. 2009. Payments for ecosystem services: a new way of conserving biodiversity in forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28(3), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549810902905669
Wunder, S., Börner, J., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Feder, S., & Pagiola, S. (2020). Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094206
Zeuss, D., Brandl, R., Brändle, M., Rahbek, C., Brunzel, S. 2014. Global warming favours light-coloured insects in Europe. Nature Communications, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4874